7 Overrated Rock Guitarists Who Don’t Belong in the ‘Greatest’ Conversation

Some guitarists have become household names because of fame, media coverage, or band success. But being well-known doesn’t always mean they’re among the best. This list looks at seven guitarists who are often ranked too high in “greatest of all time” discussions, even though their playing may not match the hype.

7. Carlos Santana

Carlos Santana brought Latin rhythms into rock, and his tone is easy to recognize. But over the years, many of his solos started sounding the same. Critics have said his work relies too much on one scale and his signature sound. His playing can feel repetitive, especially in his later albums.

Although his early work helped shape a new sound, some believe he didn’t grow much as a player. While still respected, Santana is often ranked too high on lists of great guitarists, based more on name recognition than current skill or variety.

6. Kurt Cobain (Nirvana)

Kurt Cobain helped change rock music in the ’90s. His simple style worked for grunge, and his raw sound fit Nirvana’s message. But when it comes to actual guitar ability, critics often point out that he didn’t do anything advanced. He mostly stuck to power chords and basic riffs.

While he was an important figure in music, his technical guitar skills were limited. Some fans confuse strong songwriting with strong playing. But many agree Cobain doesn’t belong in top guitarist rankings based on skill alone.

5. Jack White (The White Stripes)

Jack White has a raw, stripped-down sound that fits garage rock. His style is different and often emotional. But his playing isn’t very clean, and his solos can sound messy. Critics have pointed out that his technique is not refined, and his skill level is sometimes exaggerated.

Though his energy and creative ideas helped him stand out, many believe he’s not as talented on the guitar as people claim. His approach works for his music, but that doesn’t mean he should be considered one of the greats.

4. The Edge (U2)

The Edge uses delay effects to build U2’s famous sound. His parts add atmosphere, but some believe his playing depends too much on effects. Critics say his actual guitar skills are basic and his work would be less impressive without the equipment doing the heavy lifting.

While his sound is important to U2’s success, it doesn’t mean he’s a top guitarist. Many argue that his technique is too simple to be ranked with more skilled or creative players who rely more on ability than effects.

3. Yngwie Malmsteen

Yngwie Malmsteen is known for playing very fast with classical influence. While he’s clearly skilled, many say he focuses too much on speed and not enough on feeling or variety. His songs often sound alike, and critics say his solos lack emotion and connection with listeners.

Though he has technical ability, it doesn’t always lead to memorable songs. Some believe he plays to show off instead of trying to create something lasting. That’s why many people see him as more impressive than truly great.

2. Jimmy Page (Led Zeppelin)

Jimmy Page helped define hard rock guitar in the 1970s. His riffs and solos are famous, but his playing wasn’t always clean. Critics often point out that his live performances could be sloppy. Some also say he took too much from older blues songs without credit.

While Led Zeppelin’s music is legendary, Page’s guitar work has its flaws. Fans admire him, but his place on “greatest” lists is often based on the band’s fame more than consistent, high-level guitar playing.

1. Slash (Guns N’ Roses)

Slash is best known for his look—top hat, wild hair, and sunglasses—and for playing on hits like “Sweet Child o’ Mine.” But critics argue his solos often rely on simple patterns and sound too similar. His playing can seem repetitive and doesn’t show much variety.

Even though he’s popular, many believe his guitar skills don’t match the praise he receives. His image and stage presence may be strong, but his playing often lacks depth, creativity, and growth.